
Over the first quarter of this financial year, the government has initiated two new data-matching programs, using data that the ATO holds.
Data matching involves gathering data from various sources and comparing it. For example, records from different agencies or businesses are compared, with the results presumably distinguishing those that are being paid benefits for which they might not be entitled, or those that might not be paying the proper quantity of tax.
For the ATO’s half, it will collect information from financial institutions or different agencies and match this with its own data, which is sourced from tax returns, financial statements, and different tax records. In the past, data matching activities were focused on the following methods:
The ATO then maps this data with information held in its archives to uncover any discrepancies.
This instance, the concentration is to be on data held by Services Australia (the government body that became the executive agency in February this year in the Social Services portfolio responsible for health, social and welfare payments and services — known by most as Centrelink).
Of the two new programs, one will be looking specifically at comparing information held by the ATO in relation to the JobKeeper payment and information reported to Services Australia’s “customers” in relation to social security payments.
The aim, as mentioned in the notice announcing the program, is to uncover people who may be registered for both the JobKeeper program and social security payments, and “identify social security customers who may need extra support to correctly identify & declare their income, to help them refrain from getting an overpayment”.
A “protocol document” describing the program was developed in consultation with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, where it is stated: “This program involves the agency receiving data file from the ATO which will contain a list of all employees who have been nominated for JobKeeper payment by an eligible employer. The agency will then handle the matching process of this data against the agency’s social security payment customers and claimants.”
It says the matching process compares the following fields of data of each payee:
The other exchange of data involves comparing information held by the ATO in relation to Single Touch Payroll (STP) and Services Australia’s databases. The aim this time is to enable:
Again a protocol document describing the program was provided, which states that the data matching program “will exchange personal information and employer/employee relationship and payroll data between Services Australia and the ATO where there is a mutual relationship for the individual”.
It says part of the objectives of the exercise is to:
ATO advice, if anyone thinks they’ve made a mistake or left something out, is to contact either the ATO or their registered tax adviser to correct the mistake or to amend any previously supplied data. “You can also make a voluntary disclosure – we may reduce or even waive penalties if you make a disclosure before we contact you,” it says.
It’s essential for you to ensure that you are aware of the accurate and verified factors to consider when declaring your income to be precise about your entitlements. Read about “ATO takes aim at ‘you-scratch-my-back’ auditing arrangements” on Austral Accountants blog.